Home Table of Contents Previous Chapter Next Chapter

Chapter 2
Dominance and Plutocracy the American Way

America is not a democracy. America is a plutocracy. Plutocracy is governance by the wealthy.

America’s current form of government is based upon a constitution written a little over 200 years ago by a small group of men that many today affectionately call “our forefathers.” In this work, a somewhat more distant or neutral term, the founders, will be used.

While claiming to have created a government that avoided favoring some particular faction of people, the founders, a small group of privileged white men, aristocrats of their time, created a government that in fact, both by its inclusions and its exclusions, favored themselves, others of their class, their heirs, and similar others through the generations. The constitution that they wrote protects private property, private contract, and other interests that were of particular concern to the American aristocracy while ignoring or minimizing the interests of principal concern to everyone else. For good measure, this privileged few made it nearly impossible to alter its constitution and then only by the privileged elites who overwhelmingly populate the seats of government holding an unending hegemony of power.

It is not that there is anything wrong with the protection of private property and private contract. Indeed, they should be protected. However, the constitution was not written in a vacuum but in the midst of a society already in existence. At the time of the writing of the constitution the distribution of power and wealth in America was already unfair and unjust, and the founders were already among the beneficiaries of that injustice.

It was rather duplicitous of the founders to protect that which they and others of their class already held in undue measure. Among the interests excluded from the constitution that concerned non-wealthy people were that they be fairly included politically and economically.

That which the founders protected benefited mostly those who least needed protection, the wealthy, while offering minimal protection to those who most needed protection, the poor. Together with non-Wealth’s inability to change the constitution, these fundamental injustices built into the constitution are the principal foundation and cause of our historically and currently unjust political-economic system.

The founders wisely created divided powers—the legislative, the judicial, and the executive branches of government—to avoid our slipping into monarchy. But they then populated each of these powers with the same wealthy plutocrats, themselves and similar others. (A plutocrat is a member of a plutocracy.) So, despite the divided powers, supremacy of power permanently resides with the wealthy, privileged few.

The result is an unjust society in which, despite the unending whining and moaning of the economic upper half to the contrary, the lives of the economic upper half are permanently subsidized by the lives of the bottom half. The upper half uses the bottom half as a beast of burden.

Our government provides for the seemingly democratic election of some officeholders. But this process is and always has been a farce, a show, a slight of hand, the exercise of form without significant power, content, or result. To the extent that our government feigns democracy, it is intended to be just something to placate the majority, the common people, while avoiding the sharing of any real power.

Superficial political and social issues may be somewhat affected by the electorate, but the fundamental essence and structure created by the founders—the plutocratic form, governance by the wealthy—always remains in place. As a result the electorate or society as a whole is always powerless to affect any fundamental result or real change.

Almost all governments, including the most authoritarian, pretend toward democracy, often even possessing constitutions which provide for elections. The former Soviet Union and its several eastern European satellite countries often held elections in which 90% or more of the electorates voted. The Catch-22 was that all of the candidates were preselected by the officials of the state. And in the authoritarian state, who are the officials of the state that preselect the candidates? They are the powerful and the wealthy.

In America and in all of today’s so-called democracies the process is the same: Wealth and Power¹ preselect and finance the short list of candidates for whom the electorate will later vote. Theoretically, any person who constitutionally qualifies for an office may enter the race. But few ever do who do not possess sufficient wealth or know beforehand that they have the blessings and financial support of Power and Wealth. Few who try without the blessing of Big Money manage to win elections. And all who win office owe Big Money big time. Thus, Wealth always maintains an overwhelming hegemony of power.

The privileged few who end up in elective office theoretically serve all of us. The sorry truth is that our government is owned and populated by Wealth which serves itself. The result of our ‘representative’² form of government, our ‘republic,’ is a perpetual plutocracy in which wealth and power become ever more concentrated in the hands of the few while the needs of the many and the nation as a whole go unmet.

By our actions toward each other and through the institutions we create, we may make our world a more humane, loving, and beautiful place or magnify life’s difficulties manyfold. While producing a significant measure of material comfort for the wealthy, plutocracy also creates abject poverty and magnifies many of life’s inherent difficulties creating an unmanageable avalanche of problems.

America has a host of social ills: poverty; crime and violence; overcrowded prisons; millions lacking healthcare; unemployment and homelessness; a stressed-out, overworked populace; fragmented, dysfunctional families with a high rate of failure and divorce; a host of addictions; alienation and loneliness; corruption in government and business; and the loss of its moral compass.

As profound as some of our many ills may seem, almost all of them are merely symptoms of our deepest ill. These symptoms cannot be cured until this deepest ill is cured. To continue the medical analogy, our nation suffers from a life-threatening congenital birth defect. Treating superficial cuts and bruises is merely a waste of time, effort, and resources. Such actions distract from and delay the only treatment that can save the patient’s life and make that life worth living.

Our deepest ill is, of course, that America is not a democracy but a plutocracy owned and governed by the wealthy. The cure, the only possible cure, is to reorganize the powers of our government by altering the wealth-serving, self-serving constitution that the aristocratic founders created.

The status quo is the existing state or conditions of a society, that is, the current political-economic relationship among the members of the society, the current distributions of power and wealth, the current way of conducting government and business, and the current laws, rules, and actions that produce the current state. Any attempt to critically examine the status quo or to alter it in a way perceived to be not in the interests of those who most benefit from it is crushed by any means, however ruthless, illegal, or immoral.

The principal political strategy of America’s dominant class is to perpetually maintain the status quo by avoiding any fundamental alteration of the system which so abundantly benefits it. The principal political failure of everyone else is their not organizing themselves into a focused power sufficient to the task of fundamentally altering the system.

Is there anyone among us who has not thought of a solution to this or that problem? Campaign finance reform, term limits, more oversight, more prisons, alms for the poor…? Such measures are only band aids for scratches.

In this work, we do not apply band aids to scratches. We go right to the heart of the matter, and we repair the heart.

We pay no attention whatever to the “horse races,” which political party won this or that race over the last few years or decades and why. Political parties are scarcely mentioned because they scarcely matter. Given the true nature of our most fundamental problem, it does not matter which particular people currently populate the seats of government. Election politics is totally irrelevant, a circus for the masses. What is wrong is not merely the people within government but the structure of the government, the distribution of its powers.

In a Las Vegas gambling house, the house prospers simply by setting the gambling odds slightly in its own favor, just slightly over fifty percent. Given these slight odds in its favor, in the long run the house wins more than half of the time and prospers.

Using the mechanisms of business and government, Wealth in America sets odds in its own favor much higher than just slightly over fifty percent. Wealth does not win all of the time. It is not and need not be an absolute power. (In fact, it is best for Wealth not to have absolute power, which would dissolve the illusion of freedom and democracy behind which it now hides.) It needs only to hold a hegemony of power to win enough of the time generation after generation to amass in its hands a fabulous mountain of our nation’s wealth, the fruit of everyone else’s labor.

The American constitution and the resulting political-economic system are in intent and result one giant scam perpetrated and perpetuated against the many by the few.

The constitution, the supporting body of law, the resulting public and private social, political, and economic institutions, and the current elite class (the American aristocracy) all work together to keep the current system in place. Rather than correcting the real cause of America’s many social ills by moving America away from plutocracy, Wealth and our elected ‘representatives’ actively sustain the status quo while appearing to attempt repair by eternally applying deliberately insufficient and ineffective patches to our unjust social system.

Wealth then cynically points an accusing finger at those who seriously attempt reform calling them liberals, leftists, socialists, communists, radicals, and activists (as if the many actions taken by Wealth to maintain the status quo and its position of privilege were not an activist position). Any loaded, inflammatory, or discrediting terms will do. The goal is not truth or real change but only and always to win.

We tend to associate tyranny with a government ruled by one person as in a dictatorship. And we associate freedom with a government ruled by many people as in a republic or, even better, as in a democracy. While something can be said for this line of argument, the principal sources of tyranny are the intent of those who rule and the systems and methods they use to achieve their ends. With wrong intent, systems, and methods even the most high-sounding and well-argued system of governance may be used by the few to physically and economically imprison and exploit the rest of the populace.

We have had no shortage of technological change. America is a technological marvel. But one should not allow technological change to mask the fact that we have the same unfair and unjust social structure and relationship with each other that existed at the time of the founders.

Whatever we may think about the founders as a group or as individuals or think about their methods of achieving their goals, the founders got a good deal right. America has a long list of blessings resulting from their effort. But what the founders got wrong they got profoundly wrong. What they got wrong holds us firmly in the choke hold of our biological past and bars the way to our transcendence into a more functional and beautiful society and a more perfect union.

Home Table of Contents Previous Chapter Next Chapter Top of Page

Footnotes

1 For convenience, the wealthy and the powerful are often referred to as singular collectives or entities. When this is done, the uppercase words Wealth and Power are used as in Our government is populated by and serves Wealth and Power first and best. We are well aware that wealthy, powerful people are not some monolithic entity possessing unitary group thought and action. Just as there is no such thing as a forest, save for the individual trees within it, there are no such things as Wealth and Power, save for individual wealthy and powerful people taken together as a class. There is every kind of person among the wealthy and powerful, and one would do well not to stereotype. But there is within this economic and social class of people sufficient consistency of thought and action as to produce on the whole a singular oppressive and burdensome effect on the rest of society. 1

2 Single quotation marks are used to enclose terms which are thrown into question. The single quotation marks indicate that the enclosed term is considered to be not really true. Depending on context, the term may be used sarcastically or even with scorn. For example, in the sentence The result of our ‘representative’ form of government, our ‘republic’, is a perpetual plutocracy. the single quotation marks indicate that our so-called representatives do not really represent and our so-called republic is not truly a republic. 2

Chapter 2 Dominance and Plutocracy the American Way

Footnotes

Chapter 2
Dominance and Plutocracy the American Way