Home   Table of Contents   Previous Chapter   Next Chapter


Chapter 15
How should the burden of the personal income tax be distributed, that is, how should the tax rate be scaled?

This demos issue would require the same kind of display on its page and response from the voter as the previous issue, the corporate and business tax. The issue would be presented as a line graph. As with the line graph discussed in the previous chapter, the vertical axis would express percentage rates. The horizontal axis would express annual income amounts. As before, the voter would color various portions of the tax rate line green, yellow, and red to indicate where the tax rate should be increased, kept at the current amount, and decreased. The line could approach the horizontal forming nearly a flat tax or ascend more steeply forming a progressive tax.


The demos’ control over personal income tax rates would give it control over the net size of personal incomes after taxes. This is similar to what we do today. The only difference is that instead of the rich, plutocratic few setting the tax rates for themselves and for everyone else in the nation, “we the people” would set the tax rates on ourselves.

Which approach to governance is more legitimate in your mind? Power concentrated in the hands of the privileged few who have endlessly proven themselves to be immoral, corrupt, and greedy when setting the tax rates over themselves and over everyone else or the system described in this work in which the entire electorate is empowered to set its tax rates?


Just as with the previous issue, the personal income tax could not allow any exemptions of any kind for anyone. People in need would need to knock on the door of The Glass House, the part of government that handles entitlements and handouts. It may be the case that the government would assist in certain situations. But it should be done with total visibility under the public eye.

There would be another immense benefit to handling personal and business entitlements outside of the tax system and within The Glass House. Government would focus its magnifying glass on only those seeking entitlements, not on everyone simply filing their tax forms. That would save enormous resources and free government to place its focus and resources where they are really needed.


When the corporate and business, personal income, and inheritance tax times rolled around in their due order, it would be a much less painful experience for everyone. Because there would be no exemptions for anyone, the calculation of taxes due would be easy. A corporation or business would simply sum its gross revenue or an individual would sum all of his or her income for the year from every source or note the amount of an inheritance, look up that amount in a tax table—the rates of which would have been set by the demos—and pay the tax. (The method by which the amount of each taxpayer’s tax liability would be calculated is discussed in Appendix 2.) Since the federal government would be smaller and more efficient, the tax burden would be significantly smaller than during pre-demos times.


However, during the first year or two after instituting a demos within government, there would definitely be a tax sticker shock. Since most of the many taxes that we now pay to the federal government are hidden in the prices of the products and services that we buy or are paid in a large number of tiny chunks, people do not now realize how large a percentage of their total revenue and income they now pay in taxes.

Just for the sake of this discussion we will say that when all of the visible and invisible taxes that the federal government levies are added together a certain taxpayer has been paying around 35% of his or her annual income. Now let’s say that a demos has been created, all of the hidden taxes have been removed—except one because corporations and businesses would add the cost of their single tax to the price of their products and services—and we are now paying only a single tax. A taxpayer might exclaim, “Yikes, 15%! But under the pre-demos system my income tax was only 12% of my annual income!” No, the person’s tax was 12% plus the many hidden and other taxes that were paid when purchasing private or public sector products and services and paying fees and levies. Under the demos system, the price of products and services will have decreased by the amount that they once included to pay the many hidden taxes. The taxpayer’s current 15% tax rate (plus some small percentage amount still hidden in the price of products and services since corporations and businesses still have to pay a single tax) cannot be rightly compared with the previous 12% income tax rate alone. It must be compared with the 35% overall rate that the taxpayer was really paying under the pre-demos system.


Home   Table of Contents   Previous Chapter   Next Chapter   Top of Page

Beyond Plutocracy - Direct Democracy for America    www.BeyondPlutocracy.com
© Copyright 2001-2017   Roger D Rothenberger